IProof
PowerRIP 2000 as successor to Birmy PowerRIP 2000.
We
are currently seeking a better understanding of the relationship
of iProof PressProof, Birmy PowerRIP 2000, and Birmy PressProof
Proofing System. As soon as we understand the situation we
will update this page in our next following update season.
We
know Birmy from years back, when it was basically the only
low-cost RIP
to run the sluggish Epson desktop printers. Since those cheap
printers only cost a few hundred dollars, there was no incentive
to pay $2,000 for an industrial-strength RIP. Birmy was just
fine: besides, like everyone who starts in digital imaging,
most begin with an Epson (as did we in 1997). That's why these
are labeled as entry level. However these are disposable printers,
and gradually people learn there are better options from other
manufacturers.
iProof
is a clever idea. Offer a low-cost RIP as a proofing solution
with an associated proofing paper. But would a professional
pre-press bureau actually use iProof? What about Aurelon,
SeeColor (not many recent updates), ColorBus (they disappeared
for a while) or the more sophisticated BEST
color management RIP? We won't get into CreoScitex and
the Iris proofers, since most people have long ago learned
that you can find more economical solutions. One Iris desktop
proofer is reportedly made by Canon. One of Iris's large format
printers is their version of the basic Mutoh,
which has the same piezo printheads as the Epson
9000. Rebranding is typical in the digital imaging business
however the rebranding needs to be clearly stated.
Back
to iProof PressProof. It is difficult to tell where Birmy
ends and where "iProof Systems" begins. PowerRIP
2000 seems to be a growth out of the original Birmy RIP for
cheap Epson desktop printers. These printers are sold to mostly
unsophisticated users. An Epson is usually the first inkjet
printer that most photo-minded people buy. Epson simply does
a better job than HP of addressing the photo hobbyist in the
desktop and 24" range.
We
received three e-mails questioning whether or not Birmy was
a facet of the origin of iProof. Thus we are checking around
on this matter. MacWeek states that iProof PowerRIP 2000 was
developed by Birmy Graphics (Thursday April 27, 2000). Adobe.com
itself also states that Birmy was the original source for
iProof PowerRIP 2000. On this basis we stand by our original
report on this aspect, though we are continuing to find out
more information. We thrive on challenge.
Birmy
had an acceptable reputation as an economy entry level
RIP
for desktop printers. Definitely better than Epson's own
print drivers. But if you intend to do serious proofing
then you
ought to consider a serious proofing software. We have many
independent sources in Germany, people in the inkjet business,
so we can find out about RIPs there as well, especially
during
CeBIT tradeshow and Photokina tradeshows, both of which
are in Germany. We also have many other sources of learning
about products.
The
Birmy RIP does not use true Adobe PostScript, but emulates
it, as do also many other RIPs including BEST itself (as iProof
points out to us). We had a Birmy RIP for our first two Epson
printers but threw both printers away long ago (this was not
the fault of Birmy). Now we have an Epson 7500, great output
but it does not need a RIP; works just fine on its onboard
drivers. But if you need PostScript, then you need a RIP.
We definitely would want a better RIP than Birmy and a RIP
that was not as overpriced as is the EFI Fiery RIP. So that
there is no misunderstanding, a high price by itself does
not make a RIP any good. We found that out the hard way. when
we ended up with two EFI Fiery RIPs that we feel were grossly
overpriced and underfeatured.
What
we have to better understand, is whether a low-priced RIP,
with its origins in desktop sized Epson printers, is the appropriate
RIP software with which to run a large format printer in a
production environment? This is a legitimate question to ask.
An
economy RIP is tempting, but if it won't do what a prepress
proofing solution really needs to offer, then you will end
up paying twice. Once for the cheap RIP, then again for the
professional RIP that you should have bought to begin with.
However if the bargain-priced RIP is just the same as the
more expensive one, then that's a true bargain.
Again,
the challenge: we now have an opportunity to really check
these aspects out. Being nonprofit we are a bit slow, but
we have so many sources of information worldwide that we can
put together a good understanding of a product.
An
alternative would be various software packages available from
Aurelon, such as DeskCheck and the related proofing software.
These allow you to handle a larger range of printers and virtually
any kind of proofing paper. Disadvantage is that few companies
sell this European RIP. There is no tech support hotline in
the USA either. People who actually use this software evidently
like it. As soon as we have an opportunity we will test the
whole Aurelon suite, though most of their capabilities are
now available in ProofMaster from PerfectProof,
sort of the successor to Aurelon. We also have Adobe PressReady
and BEST. Adobe PressReady dropped from the market and the
printer it was bundled with, a desktop 4-color printer from
HP, was not impressive.
It
helps to have a proofing software that works on the Epson
1520,
Epson 3000 (our two least favorite printers but lot's of people
are stuck with them), Epson 2000, Epson 5000, Epson 5500,
Epson 7000, Epson 7500,
and Epson 9000,
as well as with Canon,
Hewlett-Packard, and other well known printer brands. In recent
months iProof has updated to cover the newer Epson, so their
RIP now covers wide format size. We know Epson dealers so
we can check out their opinion on iProof.
In
summary: we are now checking out which of the professional
color management RIPs are good for proofing, other than the
super-expensive software from CreoScitex. At present the proofing
solution we like is BEST. We do not accept sponsorship from
a company until we know the personnel behind the product in
person. That's why we go to virtually every tradeshow we can
find (even to the sign printers tradeshow in Mumbai, India).
Our facilities in Germany were near Krefeld so we knew their
RIP since many years. We actually go and inspect the companies
in person: went to visit Aurelon in Holland, for example.
More importantly, we check with the wide format printer manufacturers,
in person, to learn what RIPs work well with their printers.
We also check to see what major international professional
proofing companies select, such as Imation (former 3M), Heidelberg.
However
we are always open to new, different, and optional RIP solutions,
so if we get more news on iProof we will report back.
For
additional information and for help making your decision now
, ask for the "FLAAR Report on Large Format Inkjet
Printers as Proofers." These are sent to you as a PDF
file by our university at no cost.
Please
note that FLAAR is dedicated primarily to large format printers,
defined as 24" and above.
If
you are unsure which report is best for you, just explain
what you intend to print, whether this is for commercial use
or in a small fledging business, whether you are new to this
or already have another inkjet printer, and so on. This way
our staff can judge which FLAAR reports are most appropriate
for you.
If
this will be your first printer, then we have a special report
that holds your hand and leads you through all the basic questions
that will assist a first-time buyer of a large format printer.
Purchase
the FLAAR report on "RIP + Help." This explains
what RIP software is, why this is useful, and includes tips,
warnings, information, and help for a wide range of matters
for a newbie. Here you will really appreciate that FLAAR is
based at a university; Professor Hellmuth has plenty of experience
writing in a manner that explains what you need, and why.
iProof,
iProof PressProof, PressProof Proofing System, PowerRIP 2000
are all either registered trademarks or otherwise designations
of iProof, and/or Birmy.
|
|
|
|
All reports by Dr. Nicholas Hellmuth |
UPDATED:
August 02/2001,
Last updated Jan. 4, 2002
|